Sunday, June 2, 2019
Characterization in Albert Camus The Plague and Samuel Becketts Waiting for Godot :: comparison compare contrast essays
Characterization in Albert Camus The Plague and Samuel Becketts Waiting for GodotCharacterization is an important aspect of Waiting for Godot and The Plague. In both works, the authors use characters to bear witness their own views and enable the reader to understand themes and messages. In The Plague, Camus discloses a small part of himself in each of the primary characters. The main character, Dr. Bernard Rieux, represents Camus own rejection of needless injury and his overwhelming compassion and respect for people searching for meaning in life (Lebesque 80). He silently accepts all that happens in the course of the epidemic, waiting patiently for the pestilence to die away. His role in the book can be summed up when he tells Father Panaloux that Salvations much too big a give voice for me. I dont aim so high. Im concerned with mans health and for me his health comes first (219). Rieux rejects any form of heroism, focusing all of his energy on his duties as a doctor. Dr. Tarr ou, the other protagonist in the work, shares a smaller portion of the narrative duties. Unlike Rieux, Tarrou often gives a personal, more moral account of the events happening rough town. He often gives his own opinions on something, rather than a simple impartial explication. Tarrou expresses a desire for simplicity and directness while also deficiency to rid himself of all evil. He identifies the plague with the death penalty and launches into an elaborate story about how his father was a lawyer and regularly fought for the death penalty. His frantic reactions against capital punishment express Camus own views of a world in which the murder of people is legal and human existence becomes worthless (Rhein 44). Characterization is key out in establishing the theme of Waiting for Godot. Vladimir and estragon seem to have two modes of existence together and by themselves. One critic observes, As members of a cross-talk act, Vladimir and Estragon have complementary personalities (Esslin 29). Vladimir seems to be the more stable of the two, while Estragon is more of a dreamer. Vladimir pretty much makes all of the decisions, and he is the only iodin to remember significant events from the past. He is always the one to remind Estragon that they must wait for Godot, and he seems to be the only one who cares about the consequences of not waiting.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment